Newest Photos

VIEW ALL

Site Search


Web duchovny.net

David Search
The X-Files on iTunes
The X-Files on iTunes
      Amazon.com
      Amazon.co.UK
      AllPosters.com
      eBay
      Art.com

About Duchovny NET
DuchovnyNet is a fan run website and is not affiliated with Mr. Duchovny in any way. "The X-Files" TM and © (or copyright) Fox and its related entities. STALKERATZZI

Site Statistics
  • webmaster: gertiebeth
  • host: the fan sites network
  • established: 1999
  • online:
  • listed: CE / LL
  • Excerpts from Empire Magazine, September, 1998

    The Unstoppable X Machine
    by Simon Braund
    Photographs by Mark Anderson

    Alien abduction. Killer viruses. Mutants. Murder and madness. Welcome to paranoia central. Simon Braund meets David Duchovny and asks just what the hell is going on with The X-Files?
    Photo Photo Photo

    The New York-born Duchovny came to The X-Files after a string of small but significant roles in films such as The Rapture, Kalifornia and Julia Has Two Lovers. He was also memorable as a cameraman Rollie Totheroh in Sir Richard Attenborough's Chaplin, as Charles Grodin's arch nemesis in the inexplicably popular slobbery-dog flick Beethoven and as transvestite detective Dennis/Denise Bryson in David Lynch's Twin Peaks. He is delighted when informed that his performance in Zalman King's softcore vat of ordure The Red Shoe Diaries is just as famous here as it is in the States.

    "Great, let's talk about that and not The X-Files then," he says gleefully.

    Enjoying a semi-flourishing film career, Duchovny wasn't planning to do any television until his English manager urged him to read the script for an intriguing new pilot.

    "I was afraid of getting involved with a show that would run for a long time," he explains. "Actually, it was more the fear of getting involved in a BAD show that ran for a long time. But I thought the script was good and I liked the character. I didn't think it would become a series because it was about aliens which I thought was kind of a silly topic. People might be interested but I didn't see how you could elaborate on it. I thought: four or five episodes and you either catch the alien or you don't. If you don't people will get bored. If you do, that's the end of it. I thought I was being very clever. I thought I could do a part that I wanted to do, make a little money and get out."

    However, to paraphrase a famous jock poet, the best laid plans of mice and men go wobbly when viewing figures head for the stratosphere and you become not only the anti-hero idol of millions but also the latest person to don the "thinking woman's crumpet" yellow jersey.

    "What I liked about Mulder," says Duchovny, "is that I'd just done three parts that had to do with some odd sexuality, and here was a character who had no sexuality, or at least no superficial sexuality. To me what Freud said about all energy being sexual is the same as Indian chakra, which is about sexual energy starting at the base of the spine and moving up into different cerebral and emotional realms. I thought, okay, here's a chance to develop that energy, which I'm already comfortable with, bring it up the spine and create a character whose energy is channeled into some quest other than the physical. That's why I wanted to do the role. I didn't go, 'Finally, a script about aliens!'"

    Apparently Duchovny's moulding of Mulder went a little further than simply stoking up his chakra and pointing it in the right direction.

    "Chris Carter had this image of Mulder looking like Vitas Gerulaitis. I didn't think that was quite right," he says, with exquisite dryness. "I made a decision based on all that silly mystical stuff about chakra, and I also decided that he was not going to be Dr. Who. I told myself that he was not going to be a mad scientist. He has to be reliable, even though he's insane. I knew he was crazy, but he had to appear sane.

    "I mean," he says, warming to his topic, "on paper the things that we're doing are absolutely ridiculous. They're just silly. When I first did interviews for the show and I had to explain to people what it was about, I'd be in the middle of it and suddenly think to myself, this is the most ridiculous stuff I've ever said in my life. I had to say to people, 'Look, trust me, it's really good. It sounds terrible, but it isn't.'"

    In fact, the X-Files is very far from terrible. It is, arguably, the best non-comedy series to have emerged from the patchy quagmire of American TV since Laura Palmer was zipped into a body bag. And Duchovny has a pretty firm idea of where its appeal lies.

    "It's not camp," he says, "and that is one way we could have gone with it. I'm not a science fiction fan so I may be wrong, but it seems to me there are two types of sci-fi. There's the campy Dr. Who style, and then there's the kind of soap opera style, like Star Trek. Star Trek is very parabolic, you know that Spock represents the mind and that Kirk represents the heart. It's like reading a medieval morality play. We try to ground things in reality, not in parable and not in camp. I think we're unique in that we're trying to do a drama about extraordinary things yet trying to minimise them in order to make them real."

    In one instance [in the movie], a dispirited Mulder pours his hear out to an incredulous bartender. It's an inebriated and not entirely comfortable précis of a character that Duchovny has honed to perfection over the last five years.

    "I think that was the greatest challenge of the movie," he says. "How do you introduce a character who people already know and love? But the scene in the bar is nowhere near as bad as Scully's speech. Scully's is basically, 'Mulder, I've been with you for five years and I gave up a career in medicine...' It's horrible. Luckily with mine I was drunk so I could give you all the self-pity and the self-explanation and the self-absorption that are the necessity of back-story speeches. To me the scene works because I'm playing off Glenne Headly, the bartender, who is standing in for the audience members who know nothing and you see how ridiculous this man really is. That to me is very clever."

    And, to be fair, if you're familiar with the series, it makes you appreciate just how common this type of speech is in other movies.

    "Yeah, I know," agrees Duchovny. "It's kind of unfair to single out our movie. It's too easy because you're waiting for it to happen, you're sitting there going, 'Well, how are they going to explain this....'

    "In the opening scene (where Mulder and Scully, back on the beat after the closing of the X-Files, are searching for a hidden bomb in the Dallas Federal Building), you've got Scully being hyper-rational and Mulder going 'I'm all for womens' intuition' and everybody gets the idea. After five years you can rely on a lot of goodwill from the audience about what their relationship is. The gestures between us become less and less because the audience supplies the rest. It's really become a relationship of glances. In the movie, because the audience doesn't necessarily have that goodwill, it's got to be more verbal. It's got to be, 'We've been working together for five years and I trust you and blah, blah, blah'. It's just one of the necessary evils. But also one of the interesting challenges, to try to make that as full as the more subtle types of communication."

    Another challenge for Duchovny was adapting to the grindingly slow pace of moviemaking after the frenetic shooting schedule of the TV series.

    "Doing a movie you have a lot more time, which is usually a good thing because you're creating a character and you want as much time as you can get. In TV-land we do about seven or eight pages of script a day. In movieland we do a page and a half, sometimes less. The pace is six times as slow. I didn't need all that time because I wasn't discovering a new character, so it was very hard for me to keep focused. It's also an action movie so there was a lot of set-up, a lot of lighting and a lot of special effects - a lot of alien business. That takes an incredibly long time to do, much more than you'd ever think. We spent three days just doing the exit from the building before the explosion at the opening scene, which is maybe half a page of script. For an actor, that's boring. It just meant I ran into a cab, drove a hundred yards, got out of the cab and said, 'Next time you're buying.' And that took three days. It can drive you crazy. TV, I guess, is more athletic. You're out there hitting the ball every day, you're playing a match every day. A movie is more like playing three matches in three months. I had maybe five days doing what I'd consider heavy scenes - the meat, the fun part of acting. And I had five weeks of running around pointing my flashlight."

    Thankfully, all this has paid off handsomely and the movie itself is predominantly free of bullshit parts. What is perhaps most gratifying is how a $60 million budget has allowed Bowman to put things on the screen that the TV show is only ever able to hint at.

    "For a viewer, I think you get the best of both worlds," says Duchovny. "We deliver the humanity and the relationships between the characters and the mission they're on. But beyond that, we show so much more of the hardware. On TV our aliens are children in rubber suits standing behind a screen. We can't show them because they look like children in rubber suits..."

    While we're on the subject of aliens...

    "What, do I believe in them," he asks this with the amused resignation of a man who could have retired to Bermuda by now had he been given a dollar bill for every time this question was asked.

    "It seems likely to me that there would be something out there," he says deliberately. "There's probably some planet out there somewhere where they have a television show called The Z-Files, and right now some interviewer is asking this hideously ugly actor, 'So, do you believe in humans?'"


    Braund, Simon. September, 1998. "The Unstoppable X Machine." Empire Magazine.

    + Home + Updates + Photos + Videos + Articles + Store + E-Mail Gertie + About DuchovnyNet +